Quote Originally Posted by Alex Bragi
You certainly raise some very good points there, however…

I fully support any adult being allowed to participate in any consensual sexual play, and the right to view or read pretty much anything of the same. Only, I can’t help but feel that you’re trivialising the rights of women, jews, blacks and the minority groups mentioned in this manifesto by comparing them to a bunch of blue movies, dirty pictures and sex stories.

###Of course the right to read or see pornography is trivial compared to those other matters. But the right to read, see, hear, and say what you want is not trivial at all. Wouldn't you agree that without freedom of expression, there is no liberty? Pornography is only the black sheep in the family of expression, but it is a sheep that should not be sacrificed on the altar of conformity. ###

I simply fail to see the equation between someone not getting all the porn they think they’re entitled to and being discriminated against because of your race, sex, or re ligion. It’s your right to express your view for sure, but please try to keep it in perspective.

And, of course I will always be on the front line of anyone who dares to harm or corrupt “society’s most vulnerable members”—our kids. And that’s why, to that degree, I do support a certain amount of censorship.
### I do too. I see no reason why a consumer needs to have the ability to buy an adult publication from a sidewalk newsrack for instance, where it would prove offensive to some. Certainly all participants in sexual films and photography must be capable of informed consent -- i.e. be adults with the mental capacity to make such decisions, unimpaired by alcohol or drugs. Those standards would not countenance child pornography or any sexual activity in which someone is harmed against their will.

Boccaccio