Welcome to the BDSM Library.
  • Login:
beymenslotgir.com kalebet34.net escort bodrum bodrum escort
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    246
    Post Thanks / Like
    I believe the intent and the statute allows us to hold them for the duration of the "war." Something like a prisoner of war, but, since they were not wearing a uniform, they don't fall under the Geneva convention, so not official prisoners of war and no rights under the Geneva convention. They're better off than in the old days. When George Washington captured an "enemy combatant" who was not wearing a uniform, he shot em on the spot.

    fantassy

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    115
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by fantassy
    I believe the intent and the statute allows us to hold them for the duration of the "war." Something like a prisoner of war, but, since they were not wearing a uniform, they don't fall under the Geneva convention, so not official prisoners of war and no rights under the Geneva convention. They're better off than in the old days. When George Washington captured an "enemy combatant" who was not wearing a uniform, he shot em on the spot.

    fantassy
    Ok so they can be held for the duration of the 'war'. uuummm what war is that? The war in afghanistan? Well, unless I'm mistaken, that war is well and truly over but many at Gitmo were not even a part of it, captured in other countries based on other suspicions. Perhaps you mean the ongoing 'war on terrorism'? A 'war' that will never end. Do you suggest that someone may be held without charge or trial purely on the basis that he may be terrorist - forever??

    So much for 'free' america ... its only free if you agree with them.

    Brosco

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    246
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by Brosco
    Perhaps you mean the ongoing 'war on terrorism'? A 'war' that will never end. Do you suggest that someone may be held without charge or trial purely on the basis that he may be terrorist - forever??

    So much for 'free' america ... its only free if you agree with them.

    Brosco
    Well, I agree that is where the GITMO justification breaks down. George W. would say it is the war on terror, and you're right that it will never end.

    HOWEVER, you certainly have no cause to complain about a "free America." A certain American has been extremely generous and totally free with you.

    fantassy

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Back to top