Quote Originally Posted by wmrs2 View Post
You need to be more original with your criticisms and less influenced by miss represented facts. Lost in the many facts you present is the application of respect that is due every president. Bush has done his best and does receive credit for many successes from fair minded people. My opinion is that the liberal minded people who blame Bush for all the evils in the world, including the bleaching of the oceans (how trait), think that the American people do not know that the Democrats have been equally responsible for things that have gone wrong in the world as the Republicans.

Most of American failures in the world have been world wide failures. The USA has not failed alone but other countries have too. when it comes down to the facts, it will not make any difference who is president if Iran decides to nuclear bomb Israel. Any wise person must be against Iraq having WMD. We can not alone in our opposition to WMD in Iran, although you say we have no allies standing with us in foreign affairs.

It is a myth that our allies have turned against us. Our friends are still our friends. The fact is that most counties in the world are opposed to democracies and have allied with the liberals to exert their power. What we see is the liberals in foreign countries ranting their failed political philosophies in the press. Bush did not turn the world against America. The liberal world has always been against our freedom. American liberals are too engrossed with taking their country back that they can not get their heads out of the sand.

Exp., did France change from liberal philosophies to conservative philosophies in one day? No, the conservative people tired of the liberal criticism of the USA while thugs were burning their country down under the name of tolerance of liberal views. Soon, I believe the complete world will tire of political correctness of the liberal philosophies and for the sake of survival will cast the "holier than thous" out.

It scares me that the liberals think they are going to accomplish all that is on their agenda. Ironically, if they do, it will cost Americans their freedoms and the middle class will perish in a classless society offered by Obama and his liberal, communistic and social co-hearts. I for one am not willing to give up the capitalistic philosophy for the complete exchange to socialism.

That was supposed to be a quote from somesome else, and by th time i got back to try and edit it the edit option was gone
wmrs2
I hardly view o
Obama s a Communist, weel wold you rasther see changed or have our ecoomy keep sliding way, 1 of the 3 Republcans that voted for the Stimuls Bill said "I do not like it at all, but somethingdone is better then nothing done"

Our Freedoms will not be lost, if they were we would have most likely lost them during the psas 8 years, warrant less wiretaps, ect ect
We are not going Socialist, he already said Banks for example under his term in office WILL NOT be Nationlized
And interingly enough there was a buiness in Chicago called Nation Glass" they mde windows dorrs ,ect, they shut down 4 weeks ago went bankkrumpt, but a seatle company said with the stimuls package he was able to buy them out and rehire all the emplyess thsat lost their jobs only 250 byt that is 250 less that live off the government. Obama could very well be a complete failure, but keep in mind he has only been in offce 4 weeks as oppsed tohis predessor who was for 8 years you can't compare the 2 and the house andsenate want to pass another bill, both are controlled by DEMOCRATS. Obama hasalready said if the bill cometyo his desk he will veto it
I believe in giving people achance andwith only 1 monthunder his belt ina 4 year term is is entiled to sometime 6-12 months to realy show not only what he can do but how it will effect everyones everyday life, some people may be suprised, but I bet those 250 are glad to be back at work, it is a very tiny begining but that i also a starting point and Ialso do not believe for 1 second ANYONE in Congress is a Communist