Funny thing about the seeing an atom argument. I wrote it off as just grasping for straws when i first read the thread. But then encountered it again IRL from pesky doorbell people, usually ill have the common sense to send such people away before they gain momentum, but i was in the mude for a bit of BS so i gave them 5 minutes.

Stupid atom argument comes up.. Well to the best of my rather simple understanding of science the basic principal is hypothesis->theory->law.

That is you think of some idea, "like dropped items fall" thatd be your hypothesis. So you go test that in every way you can think of and others agree with your results. You now promote your hypothesis to a theory... Should you manage to prove that your theory and its mathematics work in every possible scenario you get to call it a law (ie law of gravity).

Now theres no such thing as the atomic LAW. Theres an atomic theory and it does offer models and guidelines as to how chemicals behave. Thus its just a general rule of how atoms and chemicals will most likely act. Models again being a visual representation made entirely to explain things. I dont have to know if atoms exists or if they look like the planet/core model or the goofy bubbely iso models. All i got is a general explanation that just so happens to be more accurate than religius writing.

Pretty much every single religius law (barely hypothesis by science standards) you can prove wrong or inaccurate in your backyard. But some of the more esotheric ideas such as the soul, heaven and hell. Well we will see about those once wer dead. Given the general inaccuracy of religius writing im kinda assuming therell be a surprise for everyone. Prolly just some crappy ingame graphics and the names of the dev team thou.