No, the Mexican government is the pyromaniac. The illegals are the burning embers.
We accept responsibility for those who are us. Family, tribe (city), clan (state), country, in that order. But in this case that means legal citizens, regardless of race or country of origin. That includes, among others, legal Latinos.We accept responsibility for people who are the same as us?
I'd like to see you justify that statement, with facts.It is, in fact, our argument that it is in USA's own best interests to tolerate illegal immigrants, because the benefits it receives are greater than the costs if has to pay.
Gee, why does that not surprise me? Well then, how about this one? (Scroll down to International Controversies.) Or this one!... by no means an unbiased article, and I reject it completely.
I guess it would be more accurate to say that the Mexican government is securing a lucrative source of income, apparently the second largest source in the country: the money sent back by the illegals.I consider it to be a deliberate twisting of the truth to say that this publication demonstrates that Mexico is "exporting" its problems.
I'm not sure I understand this.By that logic, does not the European Union stand first in line for handouts for its poor, followed by the USA, then Japan and China ... These organisations/countries are the wealthiest, so the need is less and can be spread furthest.