Humiliation and BDSM.

[tiensprtjrs]

You're saying straightforwardly that all acts of BDSM have their roots in humiliation, well as of yet I haven't been humiliated; stimulated yes. As for the point of view it is relative to each and everyone's emotional baggage I would think. For what you might think is humiliating for some maybe most stimulating, on the contrary.

[LCC]

I would not deny that humiliation can be a big part of BDSM, but I don't think it is essential. My pet loves submitting to me, but far from being humiliating it puts her at ease. She is most fulfilled when she relinquishes control to me. Some women might find being restrained humiliating, but that is in the eye of the beholder (or the bound).

[Veridical]

You're saying straightforwardly that all acts of BDSM have their roots in humiliation, well as of yet I haven't been humiliated; stimulated yes. As for the point of view it is relative to each and everyone's emotional baggage I would think. For what you might think is humiliating for some maybe most stimulating, on the contrary.

Just because you personally do not view the act as humiliating doesn't necessarily make it not humiliating, imo. A humiliating act is still a humiliating act, regardless of what those involved tend to view it as. Something that would be humiliating for me may not be humiliating for you, and vice versa, but the act itself is still a humiliating act, regardless of how one feels toward it personally.

I'm just trying to step outside the box and look at it without bias toward my position as a slave who would like nothing more than a Master to call her a cum-drooling cock whore of a cunt. While that sentence is not humiliating to me, it may be to you, or to someone else. Just because saying it does not humiliate me, does not mean the words themselves are not humiliating. That's the point I'm trying to make. ;D

Also, for the record; I said most all acts in BDSM have roots in Humiliation. I would never try to blanketly say that yes, they ALL do, no gray matter between. ;D