The Socialistic Shit-Case

[gagged_Louise]

I thought socialism was supposed to be about freedom to jump in bed with whoever you wanted for the moment... *rolls eyes*

[steelish]

I thought socialism was supposed to be about freedom to jump in bed with whoever you wanted for the moment... *rolls eyes*

No! That's socialIZING

[IAN 2411]

Quote:
Originally Posted by gagged_Louise View Post
I thought socialism was supposed to be about freedom to jump in bed with whoever you wanted for the moment... *rolls eyes*
No

No! That's socialIZING

In this swirl of political arguement it was very clever of you to spot the mistake, sleel1sh.
Well there you have it, all those young girls that were taught about Socialism at school, were deprived of the facts. They were under the impression that Sex, socialism and socializing were the same thing. Lighten up, it was an easy mistake to make when you are suposedly 13.

PS

The Falklands have only British people there, and next time Argentina come calling, we will kick ass once more. The Belgrano was sold to them by Britain, we had the right to destroy it, the mesage was; if we give you a gun then point it the other way, or like the Belgrano, we will shuv it up your ass.

Regards ian a true Brit, LoL

[SadisticNature]

I sometimes wonder if any of you were ever thirteen.

Suggesting that the majority of teenage pregnancies are planned actions designed to milk the government for subsidies that actually only pay a fraction of the costs of raising a baby and aren't profitable to the teenager is rather laughable.

The fact is the vast majority of teenage pregnancies are unplanned. Blaming socialism for teenage pregnancy due to subsidies is pretty laughable.

The science in this area is actually pretty woeful because game theory assumes all actions are planned and all agents act in their own best interests which is a terrible model of reality, people do stupid and -EV things all the time. After all insurance is inherently minus EV and hence not in ones own best interests in a game theoretic sense, yet people buy it en mass.

In fact, I think we should consider the fact that Keynesian Economics suggests the problem with the environment is that no one actually owns the air. After all why shouldn't someone own the air, and charge me for converting oxygen to carbon dioxide by breathing. Maybe we all shouldn't have the right to breathe unless we can pay for it. Killing off those who can't afford it to avoid increasing C02 seems reasonable after all :P