Threats are now "freedom of speech"

[lexora]

Its funny that those people use freedom of this and that to do what they want but they do not seem to think that those clinics have the same freedoms to be there it is someone choice to do that and really they should not force there beliefs on others but hey this is a free country but seems they only want freedom when it helps them

But as for the bomb, i think they just used it as a message like if its freedom of speech to threaten people what makes it illegal to place a bomb and use that as a way of speech to get your word across. As a way of freedom of speech.

[thir]

But as for the bomb, i think they just used it as a message like if its freedom of speech to threaten people what makes it illegal to place a bomb and use that as a way of speech to get your word across. As a way of freedom of speech.

It sounds to me as if they are either directly threathening to place one, or suggesting to others that they do so. And that cannot be legal.

Or can it??